Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Defense bill could stifle computer trade

  1. #1
    Forum Administrator Lefteris_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Age
    38
    Posts
    3,856

    Default


    In a move that has re-energized the debate over export controls on high-performance computers, the latest version of a defense-spending bill would require companies to seek licenses to export even underpowered desktop computers.

    Today, computer sellers are required to get a license to export any computer with performance equal to or greater than a system with 32 Intel Itanium processors. The current version of the defense authorization act would lower that limit to systems deemed "militarily critical" by the Department of Defense. That level is currently set to the equivalent of a computer using a Pentium 3 processor running at 650MHz, state of the art in 1999 but considered feeble today.

    Moreover, the proposed rules would apply to exports destined for any country, including U.S. allies.
    Full article at News.com

    [sarcasm]Basicaly we will need a licence to carry guns if we want to import a computer from the US.[/sarcasm]
    ...

  2. #2
    Crazed Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    USA
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,796

    Default

    Originally posted by Lefteris_D@Jul 1 2004, 02:23 PM
    [sarcasm]Basicaly we will need a licence to carry guns if we want to import a computer from the US.[/sarcasm]
    and how do you figure that.....?
    I hate all of you, especially donkeyknob.

  3. #3
    Forum Administrator Lefteris_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Age
    38
    Posts
    3,856

    Default

    Let's see, you will need a licence from the US Defence Department to export anything more powerfull than a Pentium 3 processor running at 650MHz. Is that enough?

    Did you see the [sarcasm] [/sarcasm] at all???
    ...

  4. #4
    Crazed Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    USA
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,796

    Default

    i did see the sarcasm, but the joke still sucked
    I hate all of you, especially donkeyknob.

  5. #5
    Forum Administrator Lefteris_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Age
    38
    Posts
    3,856

    Default

    What sucks is the stupidity of the US defence department.

    Anything stronger than a P3 @ 650MHz is a risk to their security... HA!!!
    ...

  6. #6
    Junior Member nesman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    191

    Default

    that is very sad

  7. #7
    Cool Newbie JAppi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Age
    33
    Posts
    57

    Default

    They tried to do that for encryption softwared didn't they?

  8. #8
    Crazed Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    USA
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,796

    Default

    its just not updated....thats all
    I hate all of you, especially donkeyknob.

  9. #9
    Forum Administrator Lefteris_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Age
    38
    Posts
    3,856

    Default

    I'm not sure about it but I think the FBI tried to force some companies to add a "back door" to the encryprion software they sold.

    As I said I'm not sure about that, it may be a rumor.
    ...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •