View Poll Results: Is there a difference between MP3s and CDS?

Voters
20. You may not vote on this poll
  • MP3s

    13 65.00%
  • CDs

    7 35.00%
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 70

Thread: MP3s VS CDs

  1. #21
    Regular Member Mourgos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    291

    Default

    In Greece cd piracy is a super huge illegal industry,so most greeks buy cds almost for free.Personally I prefer being illegal than being ripped off by the music industry.

  2. #22
    Regular Member Badger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    United Kingdom (Scotland)
    Age
    38
    Posts
    275

    Default

    On a cheap midi system, with limited equaliser functions, I really don't notice that much difference (if any) between Mp3 (even 128kbs) and CD.

    On my own amp and speaker set up, I notice a large difference between mp3 and cd.

    However for most lo-fi music I prefer vinyl. But don't have a decent record player, so it sounds a bit poo. My friend however does have a top notch record player and I just think music sounds so much better on it.
    Slugs......

  3. #23
    Jet Set Willy
    Guest

    Default

    Vinyl is much warmer, but too much of an inconvenience.

  4. #24
    Talkative Talker El Fugitivo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    97477
    Posts
    585

    Default

    With some music, even sub-standard bitrates sound fine. I've got a 96kbps mp3 of Nico's "These Days" from the Royal Tenenbaums soundtrack that sounds absolutely wonderful.

  5. #25
    Jet Set Willy
    Guest

    Default

    MP3s have roughly the same effect as a low pass filter. If the music is already dulled enough (common with crunchy synth/organ stuff - "Everything in its Right Place" for example) then low bitrate MP3 is gonna be just fine, and only noticeable on infinite frequency sounds such as cymbal crashes.

  6. #26
    Extreme Talker
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Pakistan
    Posts
    676

    Default

    I hate low bit rates, you cannot get a nice quality sound out of them.

    My old Kumar Sanu songs are encoded at 56kbps and they just don't appear to play at all. No sound, I mean I hate the sound quality.

  7. #27
    Jet Set Willy
    Guest

    Default

    I download a Phish song yesterday and it turned out to be encoded at 64kbps. Nasty.

  8. #28
    Extreme Talker
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Pakistan
    Posts
    676

    Default

    You like VBR. I hate that too.

  9. #29
    Hobby Talker
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Age
    43
    Posts
    143

    Default

    Why would you hate VBR? It only makes sense, at least in theory. Why encode at a constant bit rate while some portions of the music might be much simpler and cover a much narrower frequency band?

  10. #30
    Extreme Talker
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Pakistan
    Posts
    676

    Default

    Simply because I hate it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •