View Full Version : Rival Schools Help
jacklantern
April 13th, 2006, 20:22
Hello. I got some problem on my Rival school game.
I am using Mame32 v0.105, latest, I think.
The game runs but not 100% on video and sound.
My computer is at windows 98 and has a good video card. I even have warcraft 3 TFT running smoothly.
The game is already on trotle nad still moves on slow motion.
Pls, need help!
hagbard
April 13th, 2006, 20:37
Well, this is normal. To run arcade PSX based games (ZN1-/2) like RS on MAME at full speed you'll need a extremely powefull PC, and I think most games (probably none) won't run at full speed with today's PCs. Use ZiNc (http://www.emulator-zone.com/doc.php/arcade/zinc.html) instead.
BTW It would be good to know your PC hardware
jacklantern
April 13th, 2006, 20:56
Well, can it run on Zinc. I'll try tha instead. Oh and btw, I got the same problem on Strider2 too. Is it also a PSX game too?
-=VampyR=-
April 13th, 2006, 22:14
Well, can it run on Zinc. I'll try tha instead. Oh and btw, I got the same problem on Strider2 too. Is it also a PSX game too?
Yep...PSX game.
Be careful ZiNc is not as easy to set up as Mame.
montpics
April 15th, 2006, 09:17
At least you need a frontend either Aldo's Frontend or DaFreak's ZinCGUI. :cool:
Note : Strider 2 was made for Arcade before it was ported to PlayStation. :)
hagbard
April 15th, 2006, 12:15
Yeah, as almost every game on ZN-1/2 or System 11/12. Some said the purpose of this PSX based boards was to make easily make arcade perfect conversions to the Sony console: SFEX 1/2, Tekken 1/2/3, Strider II, etc
c2ironfist
April 26th, 2006, 19:13
I'm wondering is it just me or my computer's performance
I have a
Compaq V2000
AMD Turion ML-32 1.8ghz
ATI Radeon X200 128mb shared video card
Ram 1.128mb available for use
Rival Schools and Soul Calibour run a little slow
But other games run fairly smooth
I've changed settings like sound and frame rate but still though it doesn't all to well..
Any other suggestions or should I just try with a more powerful PC?
Alkaiser
April 26th, 2006, 19:16
Hrm. I had both running at full speed surprisingly.
Here are my PC specs:
256 MB Ram
2.2 Ghz
Windows XP
Intergrated Video Card
Also, I used Aldo's Frontend I think and played around with the settings until I got them to play smoothly.
Strider 2
Street Fighter EX 1
Street Fighter EX 2 (slight lag every now and then)
Rival Schools
c2ironfist
April 26th, 2006, 19:20
Hrm. I had both running at full speed surprisingly.
Here are my PC specs:
256 MB Ram
2.2 Ghz
Windows XP
Also, I used Aldo's Frontend I think and played around with the settings until I got them to play smoothly.
I used Zinc and that definatly runs these games bettor then Mame
So sad my favourite capcom 3d fighter unlpayable....
and I hate using epsxe though when playing Rival Schools :(
hagbard
April 26th, 2006, 19:35
Concerning SC, check this thread (http://forums.emulator-zone.com/showthread.php?t=5811).
Did you try to lower the resolution, color depth, texture quality/caching, etc?. Also Direct3D should be faster for you. Make sure you got the lastest versions of D3D and OGL plugins too
c2ironfist
April 27th, 2006, 05:59
Concerning SC, check this thread (http://forums.emulator-zone.com/showthread.php?t=5811).
Did you try to lower the resolution, color depth, texture quality/caching, etc?. Also Direct3D should be faster for you. Make sure you got the lastest versions of D3D and OGL plugins too
For Zinc I believe so it helped a bit but.. nothing good enough to play it at a good speed..
But I will try what you suggested just now
montpics
April 28th, 2006, 09:28
I believe that your current PC specs is not enough to obtain a better performance.
Anyway, use Aldos' Frontend for ZinC. (Or alternatively, you can try DaFreak's Frontend as well.) :cool:
Good luck!
c2ironfist
April 28th, 2006, 17:25
I believe that your current PC specs is not enough to obtain a better performance.
Anyway, use Aldos' Frontend for ZinC. (Or alternatively, you can try DaFreak's Frontend as well.) :cool:
Good luck!
Actualy I just played around with the settings and I get good results now, I was unfamiliar with the settings. However though does the GUI make a big difference?
I played around with both Front ends Aldo's and Dafreak;s and both were great
However, I noticed that Aldo's ran faster then Dafreak's a bit but Dafreaks had an easier layout to use especialy with controls configuration for control Pad.
Is there a performance difference with either GUIs ( such as graphics, audio? ) or are they the same?
montpics
April 29th, 2006, 09:03
Both give the same performance if you put all the settings on both Frontends. No much huge different, though DaFreak's show more friendly interface and added one GPU/Graphic plugin, while Aldo's looked better on keyboard configuration (you have to edit DaFreak's ini file as the options given is not as much as it should be.) :)
c2ironfist
April 29th, 2006, 09:12
Both give the same performance if you put all the settings on both Frontends. No much huge different, though DaFreak's show more friendly interface and added one GPU/Graphic plugin, while Aldo's looked better on keyboard configuration (you have to edit DaFreak's ini file as the options given is not as much as it should be.) :)
I'm going to stick with Dafreak's its really user friendly compared to Aldo's set up.
Now that I got things workin, I'm so enjoying Rival Schools now, instead of brining my PSX to campus I bring the laptop hehe... :D
montpics
April 29th, 2006, 09:20
Have fun then! ;)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4 Copyright © 2021 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.