Log in

View Full Version : WinMX is back



AutumnBreeze
January 25th, 2006, 12:44
The WinMX community is back, the files are back, and the users are taking a stand. Get connected Today (http://www.MXPie.com).

It is time for the RIAA to understand that they cannot destroy filesharing by intimidation any longer. They may be able to bully Corporations, but the users are not going to sit by and let it happen.

MXPIE (http://www.MXPie.com) is an effort by the users and for the users, with an agenda of making WinMX (http://www.vladd44.com/mx/) a p2p network not only for the users, but maintained, organized and perpetuated by the people.

Come Join us, we believe that we can make a difference in this fight to take away our rights. We welcome all of those who are tired of going from one p2p network to another simply because the RIAA flexed its billions of dollars worth of muscles.

MXPIE (http://www.MXPie.com) is quick, easy and free to use, it contains no spyware, adware or any other form of malware. We even provide a manual modification that allows you to see exactly what is being done that only takes minutes to do yourself.

Another site worth note is Computer Problem Help Forum (http://www.gemini777.net), this site has also been at the forefront of this movement, and can help you with any general computer problem that may or may not be related to WinMX.

Check out the MXPIE Website (http://www.MXPie.com) for everything you need.

I hope to see you on WinMX soon! Realtime help is available for WinMX 3.53 users. Go to WinMX Channels (http://www.vladd44.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=6514).

Genome
January 25th, 2006, 15:18
can we delete this thread? im pretty sure this is just as bad as supporting warez:fuckyou:

alcoatjez
January 25th, 2006, 15:26
can we delete this thread? im pretty sure this is just as bad as supporting warez:fuckyou:

Why? Just as Kazaa, WinMX is perfectly legal. It's just what people do with it...
Is Nero also forbidden, because people burn downloaded images with it...?

montpics
January 25th, 2006, 16:04
Why? Just as Kazaa, WinMX is perfectly legal. It's just what people do with it...
Is Nero also forbidden, because people burn downloaded images with it...?
Yeah, no comment with it. :cool:

Jale
January 25th, 2006, 17:53
It is time for the RIAA to understand that they cannot destroy filesharing by intimidation any longer. They may be able to bully Corporations, but the users are not going to sit by and let it happen.
lol! intimidating :p

Genome
January 25th, 2006, 18:12
lol! intimidating :p
rofl thats sorta what i meant. that dude was imho flaming the riaa. i read some of the stuff on his site. it sounded like self-appeasing dictorial jiber-jabber to me. like he was a little high on his own rightousness. but hey if you guys dont have a problem w/ it never mind then. :o

Robert
January 29th, 2006, 09:59
This exact same post was made at my usual forum (1emulation) about a month ago, and as the sites didn't breach any rules I left the thread for ppl to make comments in.

I really don't know why the author feels the need to lash out at corporate action groups....

onewecallgod
January 29th, 2006, 10:01
i honestly think its pretty funny that people defend P2P sharing programs. you're breaking the law, its simple as that. nothing wrong with that really, just live up to your actions and take it like a man.

hagbard
January 29th, 2006, 12:12
i honestly think its pretty funny that people defend P2P sharing programs. you're breaking the law, its simple as that. nothing wrong with that really, just live up to your actions and take it like a man.
Yes, but note that not everyone in this forum live in the USA, so the law could be pretty different. In France, for example, the new P2P-related law makes some kinds of usage illegal (not private usage, sell stuff, etc) but not downloading copyrighted stuff.

Genome
January 30th, 2006, 17:23
i dont assume everyone is from the usa. and im pretty sure that most countries still dont want ppl doing it. anyway back on topic.

i agree with god. no one here is a saint, still though dont defend your actions and make them sound rightouse when you infact are a 35 year old bastard who is too damn lazy to move out of his parents basement, get a job, and buy movies, music, and video games on his own. admit that you are shit.:my_rambo:

hagbard
January 30th, 2006, 18:20
This isn't a crime on most European and some Asian countries, and that's what the industry but not necessary "the countries" want to stop. I talk by myself: I use P2P, I have a job and buy more "digital" stuff than most people, however that's not only me, this a is known fact. I support what I like buying it. Come on, we can always join the RIAA buddies :D

http://www.downhillbattle.org/defense/

Zach
February 7th, 2006, 23:08
There is nothing wrong with defending P2P technology. It has plenty of legitimate uses. The issue here is not about people owning up to breaking the law. The fact is, while the majority may or may not do it, there is a group of users who share illegal materials. Using P2P itself is not a crime, and does not make you guilty of anything.

Like was stated before, it's what you DO with the technology that decides if the act is illegal or not. The biggest offenders are people who download MP3's and talk about how they are boycotting the RIAA or whoever, and act like it justifies them downloding it.. But the sad truth is the wankers are still using an RIAA product, it's just in a digital form.

In any case, none of that has been mentioned in this thread.. I don't see where this "own up to it" attitude is coming from in this case. As for the thread itself, it read like annoying spam from a user who will never post here again, and that, in my opinion, is grounds for deletion..

hagbard
February 8th, 2006, 01:15
The question it's what is legal or not, or even better, who is able to decide what is legal, the RIAA or the goverments, the industry or the people. The RIAA has nothing to do where I live, at least until now, fortunately, and that's the case on many countries: Yes, sharing it's not a crime, but making profit it is and that's what should be imho.

About the thread, I can't agree more.

Genome
February 8th, 2006, 16:15
As for the thread itself, it read like annoying spam from a user who will never post here again, and that, in my opinion, is grounds for deletion..


thank you:sleep:

Cheetah
February 14th, 2006, 03:13
self-appeasing dictorial jiber-jabber...like he was a little high on his own righteousness.

:laugh: I like that one!

Genome
February 15th, 2006, 16:41
^lol thanx:wub: